LifeLine Projects

A call to outer-London boroughs: wake up to the danger of serious youth violence!

We’ve all seen the newspaper articles. The shock story about another young person whose life has been brought to an untimely end. At LifeLine, we’ve had to come to terms with the news that some of the young people on our own programmes have died. It’s hard news to hear. And it’s equally as hard to talk to a school who doesn’t want to hear the message – that some of their students are in danger of becoming involved.

Serious youth violence, as reported by the media, has focused on cities – London in particular. And inner-city schools have had to take the lead on tackling the issue. The immediacy of the problems they face has led to an urgency in investing in programmes such as LifeLine’s SW!TCH Lives, to alter the life course of the young people in their care, before they get involved in crime that leads to serious incidents, such as stabbings.

Sadly though, schools in outer-London boroughs have been slow to recognise the danger. There’s a false sense of comfort – rather than a recognition that the county lines phenomenon has pushed inner-city issues way beyond their former boundaries into their schools. Fear of what parents might say or an over-focus on recruiting more students to bolster finances are two mistakes we have observed.

Student’s welfare must come first. There is a real danger in pretending the issue doesn’t exist. And yet a reality to the fact that if a school is under-subscribed, they tend to be offered the challenging students, those excluded from other schools – often those with difficult home circumstances. The very ones who are vulnerable to being recruited into a gang. However, taking the route of recruiting such students for the finances they bring can start a downward trend that ultimately affects the aspirations and vision of a school. Please heed our warning: there is a disproportionate impact that comes from a student who fatally wounds another.

It’s not all doom and gloom though. Our journey as a charity includes learning to stick with our mission, not altering it to fit with funders’ requirements. It’s also been to develop programmes that work in partnership with schools to prevent the above scenario from unfolding. Mentoring young people as long as they need it – giving them a responsible, trusted adult to talk to and work through the issues of life, offering a sense of vision, identity and purpose that challenges what their lived experience might tell them has long been our mission. Workshops support young people to open up and talk about the pressures and experiences that trouble them. Community activities provide social integration ‘by stealth’ while residentials offer young people the opportunity to ‘live it out’ – put it all into practise and discover that their future doesn’t necessarily have to be defined by their history.

And that’s why our plea in this article is to schools in the outer boroughs of London: Wake up! The issue is already with you! Our fully-funded programmes (along with others) are available to you – don’t wait for the police to turn up on your doorstep. Act now.


Nathan Singleton

Chief Executive Officer
Nathan is passionate about improving the lives of young people and their families. Nathan draws from the African proverb, “It takes a village to raise a child.” He believes community is the component that is missing in the modern western society and the key component that would benefit young people. Nathan believes we are there, not just to help others but to support them to become agents of change within their communities.

These articles may contain testimonials by LifeLine staff members and service users of our programmes and/or services. These testimonials reflect the real-life experiences and opinions of such staff members/ service users. However, the experiences are personal to those staff members/ service users and may not necessarily be representative of all staff members/ service users of our programmes and/or services. We do not claim, and you should not assume, that all staff members/ service users will have the same experiences. Individual results may vary.

Testimonials are submitted in various forms such as text, audio and/or video, and are reviewed by us before being posted. They appear in the newsletter in words as given by the staff members and service users, except for the correction of grammar or typing errors. Some testimonials may have been shortened for the sake of brevity where the full testimonial contained extraneous information not relevant to the general audience.

The views and opinions contained in the testimonials belong solely to the individual user and do not reflect our views and opinions. Staff members/ service users are not paid or otherwise compensated for their testimonials.